The
Man Violin
“However
hard I try, I can’t recall ever having been without a violin during my
childhood. I was three and a half when my father brought home a toy violin for
me. As I played it I imagined I was a street violinist, a poor man’s occupation
that was widespread in Odessa at the time. But I could not imagine any greater
happiness”. The little prince adulated by his mother (“Do you know why he is so
intelligent? Because, as a child, he bathed in my milk!”) becomes for all of
his fellow musicians “King David”, a title he did not usurp.
Then begins a splendid career which is confined, however, to the USSR for a long time: a hostage to the regime, he will be authorized to travel abroad only after the death of Stalin. Oistrakh, like his friend Shostakovich, will remain his entire life in Russia. Yet the rumor of his genius stretches beyond the borders and he becomes a legend in the West.
A major work from the repertoire, the Brahms Violin Concerto in which he is able to deploy all the facets of his playing style which reconciles the irreconcilable: Dionysian and Apollonian, firmly rooted in the ground and as light as air, a virtuoso without exhibition.
Violin
Concerto in D major, Op. 77
is
a violin concerto in three movements composed by Johannes
Brahms in 1878 and dedicated to his friend, the violinist Joseph
Joachim. It is Brahms's only violin concerto, and, according to Joachim,
one of the four great German violin concerti.
“The
Germans have four violin concertos. The greatest, most uncompromising is Beethoven's. The one by Brahms vies
with it in seriousness. The richest, the most seductive, was written by Max Bruch. But the most inward,
the heart's jewel, is Mendelssohn's.”
Joachim was not presenting two established works, but one established one and a new, difficult one by a composer who had a reputation for being difficult. The two works also share some striking similarities. For instance, Brahms has the violin enter with the timpani after the orchestral introduction: this is a clear homage to Beethoven, whose violin concerto also makes unusual use of the timpani.
Brahms conducted the premiere. Various modifications were made between then and the work's publication by Fritz Simrock later in the year.
Johannes Brahms
Violin Concerto in D major, Op 77
1 Allegro non troppo
2 Adagio
3 Allegro giocoso, ma non troppo vivace
David Oistrakh, violin
Moscow Philharmonic Orchestra
Kirill Kondrashin, conductor
Violin Concerto in D major, Op 77
1 Allegro non troppo
2 Adagio
3 Allegro giocoso, ma non troppo vivace
David Oistrakh, violin
Moscow Philharmonic Orchestra
Kirill Kondrashin, conductor
Royal Festival Hall, London, 19 September 1963
Kirill Kondrashin, one of Oistrakh’s preferred
conductors, directs the Brahms concerto, which has all the warmth and
confidence one would expect from a classic Oistrakh recording. Kondrashin conducts
the Brahms without a baton, in wide, fluid arm and hand movements, eliciting a
rich sound from the Moscow forces. Oistrakh is equally robust in his reading of
the solo part, which is astonishing in its breadth and sustained phrasing as well as the sharpness
of his attacks with a full-bodied tone.
This is the story of David Oistrakh, the Russian violinist referred to as "King David" in his homeland. His powerful tone, precise technique, and highly emotional style made him a worldwide legend, influencing an entire generation of players. Oistrakh, who remained in Russia his entire life (1908-1974) despite persecution for being Jewish, taught at the Tchaikovsky Conservatory in Moscow, and performed as a solo artist from age 20 until his death.
A specialist in late Classical and Romantic works, his recordings of many Romantic masterworks, especially the Brahms Violin Concerto, are considered to be without peer. The Brahms Violin Concerto and excerpts from other works are featured in the film.
There are also interviews with Oistrakh's lifelong friends and fellow musicians: Yehudi Menuhin speaks on what made Oistrakh a great violinist; Mistislav Rostropovitch talks of Oistrakh's relationship with the Soviet regime; Gidon Kremer recalls Oistrakh as a teacher; Gennady Rozhdestvensky , his conductor, recalls Oistrakh the performer; and son Igor Oistrakh recalls his father as a family man and musician. This film is an inspiring look at a man whose stated goal as an artist was to bring the rich world of classical violin music to everyday people.
It
is the violinist’s story that Bruno Monsaingeon tells from his birth in Odessa
in 1908 until his death in Amsterdam, from a heart attack, in 1974. But it is a
story marked by a wound, because it mostly takes place under Stalin. “I remain
loyal to Russia, to the country, irrespective of who is in power”. This choice,
which his friend Shostakovich also made, has terrible consequences which combine
fear and compromise. “The regime forced people to have two faces, to think in
one way and to appear in another”, says Rostropovich. Oïstrakh, who lives in
dread of being arrested, becomes, in spite of himself, a propagandist for the
regime. Until Stalin's death in 1953, he isn’t allowed to play on the other
side of the Iron Curtain. But according to Rostropovich, who experienced this
dark period: “For us music was the only window onto the sun, oxygen and life”.
Source:
Medici.tv
Wikipedia
No comments:
Post a Comment